找回密码
 加入布鲁
查看: 2679|回复: 13

[外版碟报] HDD对美版《达芬奇密码》的画质评价不低啊

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-5-13 17:21 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
HDD=HIGHDEF DIGEST

音画都给了4星(8分)的评价

是枪手?还是说大家看到的东西不一样?

节选音画质部分大致翻译如下:

The Video
The color palette of 'The Da Vinci Code' is rich and a bit dark, by intention. I appreciated the nice uses of browns, deep blues and crimson. It feels "religious," and looks smooth, clean and well-saturated. Fleshtones sometimes feel desaturated or a little orange-y, but it's appropriate to the stylistic intentions of the film. Blacks are solid throughout, and contrast healthy and adding a nice sense of the depth to the image. This is a very detailed transfer as well, with strong clarity and healthy shadow delineation -- even the murkier areas of the picture held pretty firm (there is some black crush, but it usually isn't bothersome). And befitting a relatively new release, the print is in tip-top shape and there are no encoding issues. 'The Da Vinci Code' should not disappoint.

画质
《达芬奇密码》的色彩被有意处理得比较鲜艳又略显昏暗。对于棕色,深蓝和红色的运用令人赞赏。有一种“宗教感”,而且感觉光滑干净,饱和度适中。肉色有时有褪色感,偏橘红色,这与影片的风格相吻合。黑色始终十分稳定,对比度恰当,使画面有深度。影片画面的制作也十分注重细节,清晰度和阴影的线条都很优秀——即使在朦胧的画面中也十分清晰稳定(有一些黑色污点,但问题不明显)。由于是新片,胶片保存得很好。《达芬奇密码》的画质不会令人失望.

The Audio:
'The Da Vinci Code,' like any big, glossy thriller, pumps up its big moments with plenty of surround action. The rears are frequently engaged with prominent discrete effects and nicely-handled ambiance. The score may be a bit over-the-top, but it's bled well all around and certainly adds to the sense of envelopment and atmosphere. Dialogue is important here, as the film is overloaded with it, as well as Audrey Tautou's accent, which was sometimes hard for a dumb American like me to understand. I did struggle at times with low tones, with mumbled dialogue sounding obscured. Otherwise, the mix is robust and full-bodied, and low bass is strong. 'The Da Vinci Code' sounds as good as it looks.

音效:
索尼为《达芬奇密码》提供了TrueHD5.1环绕音轨,后置音箱始终表现出精致的音效和环境氛围感。配乐也许过头,但有很强的环绕感,为环境和氛围添色不少。混音非常强烈有力。对话在这部影片中十分重要,奥黛丽•塔图的口音对我这种比较笨的美国人来说有点难懂。有时甚至听不清。对话略显含糊,令人费解。总体而言,《达芬奇密码》的音效和画质一样出色。


按泰盛的说法,这个大陆版应该是和美版共版的,看过大陆版的各位觉得HDD评价的合理不?
发表于 2009-5-13 17:22 | 显示全部楼层
貌似喜欢这个片子的人还蛮多的啊
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-13 17:31 | 显示全部楼层
没看过BD版,个人感觉DVDTS版画面好过音效[特别是动态部分,当然跟录制电平稍低或许也有关].
对于一部惊溧片来讲,这会使人对电影投入感打了折扣,所以看到之前的一些评语有些意外.
回复

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
发表于 2009-5-13 17:33 | 显示全部楼层
应该是大家对画质的理解不同吧

就像很多人会说《皇家赌场》开头一段黑白画面噪点多,画质很差云云,都是比较无语的
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-13 17:39 | 显示全部楼层
典型的各花入各眼
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-13 17:41 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 阿布 于 2009-5-13 17:21 发表
HDD=HIGHDEF DIGEST

音画都给了4星(8分)的评价

是枪手?还是说大家看到的东西不一样?

节选音画质部分大致翻译如下:

The Video
The color palette of 'The Da Vinci Code' is rich and a bit dark, by intention. I ap ...


共版的东东大家看到的画质不会有别的。只不过判断画质的好坏之前最好是先搞清导演和摄影的意图且在影院看过此片。
Blu-ray.com上开始对此碟的测评仅给画质打了2.5/5分,在遭到众DY炮轰及圈内人士拍板砖之后在上周把碟评改了,画质4/5分

Since cinematographer Salvatore Totino used Long Cooke S4s lenses with diffusion filtering for the film's principle photography, a relentless brigade of dense shadows swallow both the actors and locations, robbing the image of the sharpness, definition, and clarity often associated with a high definition presentation. Detail is almost entirely obscured by darkness, soft close-ups and establishing shots dominate the majority of scenes, and textures simply cease to exist every time the lights grow dim. Even when a few decent day-lit exteriors salvage the transfer late in the game -- finally filling the screen with more refined edges and more distinct detailing -- a slight haziness persists. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if a number of viewers eject the disc just to make sure they didn't purchase a DVD. Still, black levels are incredibly rich, delineation is just as revealing as Totino intended, and the transfer itself offers a reliable rendering of the film's theatrical print. Furthermore, artifacting and banding are kept to a bare minimum, source noise is nowhere to be found, and grain ranges from invisible to unobtrusive.
All things considered, The Da Vinci Code may be the last disc you grab to show off your home theater, but it is an accurate representation of Howard and Totino's intentions and deserves to be praised as such. It's a soft and murky, yet technically sound transfer that should satisfy fans armed with appropriate expectations.

所有碟评中最重要的字眼可能还是“Intention", 导演和摄影想这样,我们就没辙了
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-13 17:44 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 洛洛特马希 于 2009-5-13 17:41 发表


共版的东东大家看到的画质不会有别的。只不过判断画质的好坏之前最好是先搞清导演和摄影的意图且在影院看过此片。
Blu-ray.com上开始对此碟的测评仅给画质打了2.5/5分,在遭到众DY炮轰及圈内人士拍板砖之后在上周把 ...


印象中当初在影院看时画面觉得不差
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-13 17:47 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 洛洛特马希 于 2009-5-13 17:41 发表


所有碟评中最重要的字眼可能还是“Intention", 导演和摄影想这样,我们就没辙了


所以,画质应该是一个相对的概念,必须要有个参照物。

也许可以补充为:2.5分是对于整体行业水平而言/4.5分是对于影片标准而言
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-13 17:52 | 显示全部楼层
抛开画质参照标准不谈

我觉得索尼的画面通常都比较个性,更注重电影感和比较浓烈的色调,但对于肉眼比较敏感的画质参数如锐度/对比度就好像不是特别注重,就常常让人觉得画质不怎么样
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-14 08:55 | 显示全部楼层
这是国外网站的评论吗??如果要是大陆版本和美版共版,像是这个文章里边给予的评价这么高。那写这篇文章的哥们就是眼瞎。大陆版本的画质只能用惨不忍睹来形容。截图我都发多少张了。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入布鲁

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|布鲁蓝光网(blufans.com) ( 沪ICP备16023182号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-30 09:46

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表